Netherlands vs. Tunisia - Consensus Ensemble

2026 World Cup, Group F MD3 | June 25, 2026 | Kansas City (OPEN-AIR)

⚡ TASK-99: independent resolution | ⚠️ RAPID (no gathering) | NED draw-suffices (qualified); TUN eliminated (0pts, -8 GD)

Referee: TBD (RAPID — no gathering)

TL;DR

NED ~73% / Draw ~20% / TUN ~8%. Modal scoreline: NED 2-0 (consensus, ~16%). Gakpo #1 (~22%). Dead rubber — NED qualified (4pts, qualified), TUN eliminated (0pts, -8 GD, 0 goals in 2 matches, 9 conceded). The spread is WIDE (65-81%) because of Koeman rotation uncertainty: does he rest 3-5 starters for R32 (g4: 65%) or play tournament-team-escalation full-strength (g5: 81%)? Finding 22 blowout partial fires (TUN GK Chamakh is a 24yo rookie, NOT veteran — no ECU-CUR exclusion). TUN's only shield (hot-GK + low block) does NOT apply. Renard is 4 days into the job (bounce = zero).


Model Comparison (INDEPENDENT — 16pt spread on rotation read)

Model NED Draw TUN Modal F12 conservation F22 blowout
mm3 72% 23% 5% NED 2-0 (15%) -4pt (Tournament Team offset) 12-15%
g4 65% 20% 15% NED 2-0 (18%) -8pt (full, Koeman pragmatic) 12% (capped rotation)
g5 81% 16% 3% NED 3-0 (15%) -4pt (tournament-team dominates) 12-15%
Consensus 73% 20% 7% NED 2-0 -4 to -8pt partial

Spread: 16pt (65-81%) — g4 sees Koeman rotating heavily (TUN still outclassed but gap narrows); g5 sees tournament-team escalation dominating. mm3 splits the difference. Honest uncertainty on a dead rubber.


Consensus ensemble for NED-TUN. 3 models resolved INDEPENDENTLY (TASK-99). ⚠️ RAPID (no gathering). Full post-event after kickoff. Last updated Jun 25, 2026.